Bookmark Kaumudi Online  Bookmark this site  Editor@Kaumudi  |  Marketing  Print Advt rates  |  Calendar 2018        Go!    
 
 
September 20, Thursday 2018 1:38 AM       

       HEADLINES: Police take pervert home guard into custody                                              Cabinet clears ordinance to make triple talaq penal offence: Law Minister                                              Forces within JNU 'waging war against India', says Sitharaman                                              US-China trade war could last for 20 years: Jack Ma                                              Didn't expect Arjuna this year: Hima Das                                              Kaumudi Facebook
       INDIA Next Article: Chidambaram says ED on witch-hunt in Aircel-Maxis case  
       Discrimination against gays will go if criminality of section 377 is removed: SC
 
         Posted on :22:00:09 Jul 12, 2018
   
A A
       Last edited on:22:00:09 Jul 12, 2018
         Tags: Discrimination, gays, section 377 is removed,
 

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said the social stigma and discrimination attached to the LGBTQ community would go if criminality of consensual gay sex is done away with, while maintaining that it would scrutinise the legal validity of section 377 of the IPC in all its aspects.

A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, hearing a clutch of petitions challeging the constitutional validity of the 158-year-old penal law, also rejected a proposal of lawyers, seeking retention of section 377, that public opinion should be elicited on the matter, saying it did not want a referendum but would go by constitutional morality.

The bench took note of the vehement opposition of these lawyers and their allegation that the Centre has taken a "U-turn" in the case.

"On the mere concession of the Centre, we will not say that the section is ultra-vires. We will have to analyse every aspect. We will do a detailed analysis of Section 377 and its constitutional validity," the bench, which also comprised Justices R F Nariman, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, said.

"We will try to see whether section 377 of the IPC can stand the test of fundamental rights enshrined under Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (freedom of speech and association) and 21 (right to life and liberty) of the Constitution," the bench said.

It also objected to the submission of lawyer Manoj George that the Centre has made a U-turn on its stand and said that several verdicts including the one on right to privacy have come in the meanwhile and it would not be appropriate to call it a "U-turn".

The court observed that an environment has been created in the Indian society over the years that has led to deep-rooted discrimination against the community which has also adversely impacted their mental health.

The bench asked lawyer Maneka Guruswamy, who was appearing for a petitioner, whether there was any law, rule, regulation, bye-law or guideline which barred or restrained homosexuals from availing any right which are available to others.

"There are no such provisions," she said.

The bench then said the LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer) community faced the stigma because of the criminality attached to consensual same-sex relationship.

"Once the criminality (under section 377) goes, then everything will go (social stigma, discrimination etc)," it said.

"Over the years, we have created an environment in the Indian society which has led to deep-rooted discrimination against people of same sex involved in a consensual relationship and this has impacted their mental health also," the bench said on the third day of crucial hearing to decide the constitutional validity of Section 377 of the IPC.

Section 377 refers to 'unnatural offences' and says whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to pay a fine.

Referring to the provision of the Mental Health Care Act, the bench said "it also recognises the fact that such persons cannot be discriminated against on the ground of sexual orientation".

The observations came when senior advocate C U Singh, appearing for one of the intervenors, said mere striking down of section 377 will not serve the purpose as the LGBTQ community were being discriminated against on various counts.

"This community feels inhibited as they do not even get proper medical care because of the prejudice," Justice Malhotra said, adding even medical professionals do not maintain confidentiality.

The advancing of arguments remained inconclusive and would resume July 17.

Yesterday, the government had left it to the apex court to test the constitutional validity of section 377, urging that issues like gay marriages, adoption and ancillary civil rights of LGBTQ should not be dealt by it.

Taking note of the Centre's submission that other issues like gay marriages, adoption and ancillary civil rights of LGBTQ community should not be dealt, the court said it was not considering all these issues.

The bench had said it would test the validity of the law in relation to the consensual sexual acts of two adults and if it decides to strike down the penal provision then it would remove "ancillary disqualification" of LGBTQ community members which can join services, contest elections and form associations.

Lawyer Guruswamy had yesterday referred to reports of Indian and American psychiatric bodies and said homosexuality was a normal sexual orientation.

Terming the law as a "terrible colonial legacy", she had said it violated Articles 15 (discrimination on sex), 14 (equality), 19 (liberty) and 21 of the Constitution and has a "chilling effect" on the sexual minority.

A A
       INDIA
Next Article: Chidambaram says ED on witch-hunt in Aircel-Maxis case
 
 
INDIA HEADLINES
Forces within JNU 'waging war against India', says Sitharaman  
Cabinet clears ordinance to make triple talaq penal offence: Law Minister  
Army pays tributes to Lance Naik Malik  
Seven-year-old girl raped in Shahdara: Police  
BJP, Congress mock Mamata's foreign visit  
No relief from Centre, states for Nagaland disaster  
Gujarat Assembly pays homage to Vajpayee  
SC stays Patna HC order asking to set up a fresh probe team in Muzaffarpur shelter home case  
Air Tanzania to soon resume direct flights to India  
PM's silence on gangrape unacceptable; shameful govt leaves India's women unprotected: Rahul  
Bihar CM Nitish Kumar admitted to AIIMS  
Court summons Lalu, others as accused in IRCTC money laundering case  
SC notice to Centre on plea seeking ban on 85 pesticides  
Territorial Army soldier shot dead  
BJP's popularity has declined, will be no surprise if it loses 2019 elections: Gehlot  
568 kilo ladoo unveiled on PM's birthday  
New coffee table book chronicles life of PM Modi  
Drug dealer nabbed from Kashmir by Gujarat ATS  
Bengal BJP chief's vehicle attacked in East Midnapore  
Mathura gearing up for 'Chappan Bhog Mahotsava'  
CM Parrikar unwell, Congress stakes claim to form govt in Goa  
BJP works for all castes, communities: Amit Shah  
CBI charge sheet against Mallya likely in a month, bank officials may be included  
20 lakh people join modified JanDhan scheme, total account holders 32.61 cr  
Now a mobile app to check poll code violations  
 
Do you think forced salary challenge is acceptable in the current situation?
yes
 
not
 
don't know
 
 
 
Home Kerala India World Business Sports Sci&Tech Education Automobile CityNews Movies Environment Letters 
© Copyright keralakaumudi Online 2011  |  Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Head Office Address: Kaumudi Buildings, Pettah P.O, Trivandrum - 695024, India.
Online queries talk to Deepu Sasidharan, + 91 98472 38959 or Email deepu[at]kaumudi.com
Customer Service -Advertisement Disclaimer Statement   |  Copyright Policy