Bookmark Kaumudi Online  Bookmark this site  Editor@Kaumudi  |  Marketing  Print Advt rates  |  Calendar 2018        Go!    
 
 
September 20, Thursday 2018 4:20 AM       

       HEADLINES: Police take pervert home guard into custody                                              Cabinet clears ordinance to make triple talaq penal offence: Law Minister                                              Forces within JNU 'waging war against India', says Sitharaman                                              US-China trade war could last for 20 years: Jack Ma                                              Didn't expect Arjuna this year: Hima Das                                              Kaumudi Facebook
       SCI&TECH Next Article: Shared responsibility essential for conserving migratory species  
       Pluto should be reclassified as a planet, reveals study
 
         Posted on :18:04:48 Sep 10, 2018
   
A A
       Last edited on:18:04:48 Sep 10, 2018
         Tags: Pluto , planet
 

WASHINGTON DC: The latest research has presented a case for reclassifying Pluto as a planet.
According to new research, the reason because of which Pluto lost its planet status is not valid. In 2006, the International Astronomical Union, a global group of astronomy experts, established a definition of a planet that required it to "clear" its orbit, or in other words, be the largest gravitational force in its orbit.
Since Neptune's gravity influences its neighbouring planet Pluto, and Pluto shares its orbit with frozen gases and objects in the Kuiper belt, that meant Pluto was out of planet status.
However, in a new study reported that this standard for classifying planets is not supported in the research literature.
Metzger, lead author of the study, reviewed scientific literature from the past 200 years and found only one publication - from 1802 - that used the clearing-orbit requirement to classify planets, and it was based on since-disproven reasoning.
He also added that moons such as Saturn's Titan and Jupiter's Europa have been routinely called planets by planetary scientists since the time of Galileo.
"The IAU definition would say that the fundamental object of planetary science, the planet, is supposed to be a defined on the basis of a concept that nobody uses in their research. And it would leave out the second-most complex, an interesting planet in our solar system," Metzger added.
He said that he has a list of over 100 recent examples of planetary scientists who are using the word planet in a way that violates the IAU definition, but they are doing it because it's functionally useful.
Calling the definition sloppy, Metzger said, "They didn't say what they meant by clearing their orbit. If you take that literally, then there are no planets, because no planet clears its orbit."
The planetary scientist said that the literature review showed that the real division between planets and other celestial bodies, such as asteroids, occurred in the early 1950s when Gerard Kuiper published a paper that made the distinction based on how they were formed.
However, even this reason is no longer considered a factor that determines if a celestial body is a planet, Metzger said.
Kirby Runyon, co-author of the study, said the IAU's definition was erroneous since the literature review showed that clearing orbit is not a standard that is used for distinguishing asteroids from planets, as the IAU claimed when crafting the 2006 definition of planets. "We showed that this is a false historical claim. It is therefore fallacious to apply the same reasoning to Pluto," Runyon said.
Metzger said that the definition of a planet should be based on its intrinsic properties, rather than ones that can change, such as the dynamics of a planet's orbit.
According to Metzger, the dynamics are not constant, they are constantly changing. They are not the fundamental description of a body; they are just the occupation of a body at a current era.
Instead, Metzger recommends classifying a planet based on if it is large enough that its gravity allows it to become spherical in shape. "And that's not just an arbitrary definition, Metzger said. "It turns out this is an important milestone in the evolution of a planetary body, because apparently when it happens, it initiates active geology in the body."
Pluto, for instance, has an underground ocean, a multilayer atmosphere, organic compounds, evidence of ancient lakes and multiple moons, he said
Metzger said that Pluto is more dynamic and alive than Mars and the only planet that has more a complex geology is Earth.
The study appeared in the Journal of Icarus.

A A
       SCI&TECH
Next Article: Shared responsibility essential for conserving migratory species
 
 
SCI&TECH HEADLINES
Pluto should be reclassified as a planet, reveals study  
Shared responsibility essential for conserving migratory species  
Microsoft releases Speech Corpus for three Indian languages  
Facebook likely to run on 100% renewable energy by 2020  
Can brain suppress the act of revenge?  
Kerala techies launch portal to facilitate relief measures  
Here's what you may not know about H2O  
Alexa will tell you when it has done its homework  
Students recreate horrific atomic bombings of Hiroshima using VR technology  
Study discovers compounds that can reverse cell ageing  
Online interactive courses on AI in trading, first time on internet  
Apple to fix devices damaged by Japan's floods for free  
IT industry should focus on developing new technologies  
Skype adds read receipts to chats  
Mobile app for replacement of transformers in Raj  
Kashmiri students make solar boat for Dal Lake  
NASA prepares to fly probe into Sun's scorching atmosphere  
Yoga helps against non-communicable diseases: WHO  
Spironolactone can help prevent acne: Study  
Older Amazonian forests help regulate global climate  
Goal conflict linked to depressive symptoms  
A new world: Top 10 new species for 2018  
Beat the risk of frailty with healthy heart  
Twitter to hide trolls that hurl abuse: Twitter CEO  
Fortnite is finally coming to Android  
 
Do you think forced salary challenge is acceptable in the current situation?
yes
 
not
 
don't know
 
 
 
Home Kerala India World Business Sports Sci&Tech Education Automobile CityNews Movies Environment Letters 
© Copyright keralakaumudi Online 2011  |  Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Head Office Address: Kaumudi Buildings, Pettah P.O, Trivandrum - 695024, India.
Online queries talk to Deepu Sasidharan, + 91 98472 38959 or Email deepu[at]kaumudi.com
Customer Service -Advertisement Disclaimer Statement   |  Copyright Policy