Bookmark Kaumudi Online  Bookmark this site  Editor@Kaumudi  |  Marketing  Print Advt rates  |  Calendar 2012        Go!    
 
 
August 22, Tuesday 2017 12:45 PM       

       HEADLINES: Yesudas, wife reach Sabarimala for Ayyappa's darshan                                              Lal junior, Sreenath Bhasi quizzed                                              Vinayakan's death: No anticipatory bail for cops                                              Man hangs self after setting wife on fire                                              Special trains cancelled                                              Indian economy grew fastest under Modi govt: Amit Shah                                              Malegaon blast: SC grants bail to Lt Col Purohit                                              Former DIG submits evidence to ACB showing Sasikala entering jail in civilian attire                                              Rohingya Muslims begs not to drive them away, say they’ll leave ‘one day’                                              PM Modi assures Centre's support to EPS, OPS-led TN Govt                                              US destroyer collides with merchant vessel, 10 sailors missing, five injured                                              India Day Parade held in New York                                              India will surely win 2019 World Cup: Axar Patel                                              Pro Kabaddi League: Jaipur Pink Panthers edge past UP Yoddha                                              Dimitrov, Muguruza lift maiden Cincinnati Masters title                                              Kaumudi Facebook
       INDIA Next Article: Rajiv case: HC adjourns plea of life convict Murugan  
       Triple talaq not integral to Islam, is intra-community tussle, Centre tells SC
 
         Posted on :08:02:24 May 18, 2017
   
A A
       Last edited on:15:28:21 May 18, 2017
         Tags: Triple talaq not integral to Islam, is intra-
 
NEW DELHI: Triple talaq is neither integral to Islam nor a "majority versus minority" issue but rather an "intra-community tussle" between Muslim men and deprived women, the Centre on Wednesday told the Supreme Court.
 
Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, in his rebuttal to the arguments favouring the 1,400 year-old practice of triple talaq, made a strong pitch for judicial scrutiny on grounds including violation of fundamental rights like right to equality and gender justice and said that the apex court cannot shy away.
 
A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar, asked the Centre as to why it did not legislate to regulate marriages and divorce among Muslims.
 
"You (Centre) said if court quashes triple talaq then you will make a law but why the government did not make a law for last 60 years?" the bench, also comprising justices Kurian Joseph, R F Nariman, U U Lalit and Abdul Nazeer, asked.
 
Rohatgi replied that the hallmark of a secular court was to reform without waiting for a legislation, when such matters come to it.
 
"I will do what I have to do but the question is what will you (court) do? I have given statement on instruction. I speak for the government and can't speak for parliament," he said reiterating that the top court was guardian of fundamental rights and has to see whether there was any violation of such rights.
 
Earlier during the day, the bench asked the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) whether a woman can be given an option of saying 'no' to triple talaq at the time of execution of 'nikahnama' (marriage contract).
 
"Can it be made possible to give an option to a wife that she can say that she was agreeable to or not agreeable to it (triple talaq)? 
 
"Is it possible to pass a resolution to all 'qazis' to include this condition (giving right to woman to say 'no' to triple talaq) in 'nikahnama'? Give an option to wife to say 'no' to triple talaq," the bench said.
 
Former Union minister and senior lawyer Kapil Sibal, representing the AIMPLB, said that he will respond to after talking to all the board members.
 
Rohatgi, responding to Sibal and a battery of senior lawyers favouring triple talaq, said even the core of religion has to be tested on the touchstone of fundamental rights.
 
Referring to the responses of the AIMPLB, he said that even they say that triple talaq was "undesirable", "sinful" but yet valid and wondered "then how it can be said to be integral to religion".
 
He further said this time, Muslim women have questioned the centuries-old "hegemony suffered by them at the hands of their male counterparts" of the community.
 
"The prism through which you see the case is not like majority versus minority but this is a case where it is an intra-community tussle between Muslim men and women.
 
"This time Muslim women have questioned the centuries-old hegemony suffered by them at the hands of their male counterparts," Rohatgi said, adding that the practice of triple talaq is a tussle between the "haves and have-nots" inside the community.
 
He said this fight is between men of Muslim community, who are more powerful, empowered and educated and women, not so powerful, not empowered and uneducated.
 
The court can fill up the void by judicial pronouncements if there is no law on a particular issue, Rohatgi said, adding the guidelines on sexual harassment at work place were framed by it in the Vishakha case.
 
Rohatgi referred to practises 'sati', infanticide, 'devdasi' and untouchability among Hindus and said that they have been done away with.
 
"Did courts do it? These were abolished by legislations," the bench asked.
 
"Then why do the court goes into issues like Vishaka. The court can't say that it is helpless and it cannot step in. It is the guardian of fundamental right," Rohatgi replied.
 
He said that India is "secular country with a secular constitution" which has kept core of all religions intact but they are subject to fundamental rights.
 
"We had several religions after Partition. There were people from over 600 princely states and tribes practising different faiths and religions. The core of every religion was kept but they were made subject to fundamental rights," he said.
 
He said under Article 25 (right to practice religion) of Constitution, even the core component of a religion can be tested on the grounds of fundamental rights.
 
"Rights given under Article 25 of Constitution cannot be considered as absolute", he said, adding the court has to look into these aspects as a community cannot decide what is their fundamental rights.
 
Comparing practices in Islamic countries, Rohatgi said that in 25 nations, religion continued to strive even after abolishing triple talaq and hence, this cannot be termed as "integral part of Islam".
 
"What is optional cannot be under Article 25 and it cannot be considered as an essential part of religion. If it had been integral part of religion then the religion will not remain religion in its original form but if it is optional then even if it is taken out, the religion will remain the same," he said.
 
He said that if the right to religion went against the fundamental rights, then it is the Constitution which will prevail over practices like triple talaq.
 
Sibal, who started arguments today, referred to a Delhi High Court judgement and said that it was wrong in holding that all schools of thought termed 'triple talaq' as "sinful".
 
The Supreme Court cannot be called upon to decide as to what was wrong or right with the practice and belief, he said.
 
Referring to a judgement, he went to the extent of saying that the personal law is a legitimate basis of discrimination.
 
AIMPLB also said that the court should not venture into the issue on its own as no one has approached it.
 
"Some persons have come to this court," the bench said.
 
Sibal said challenging the constitutional validity of triple talaq, being practised by a small portion of community, may revive the practice which is dying.
 
He said if a secular court like the Supreme Court decides to undertake suo motu (on its own) scrutiny of the issue with the Centre seeking a ban then, the community may take a tough stand.
 
The Muslim community is like small birds on which golden eagle preys, he said, adding "the community's nests must have the Supreme Court protection." 
 
Sibal said it is that faith with which the community is before the court today seeking protection of its personal law customs and practices.
 
"Our faith in this court for last 67 years is fundamental and with that faith we have come here," he said.
 
Today was the fifth day of the hearing on a clutch of petitions challenging triple talaq, polygamy and 'nikah halala' which is going on before a bench comprising members of different religious communities including Sikh, Christian, Parsi, Hindu and Muslim. .
A A
       INDIA
Next Article: Rajiv case: HC adjourns plea of life convict Murugan
 
 
INDIA HEADLINES
SC strikes down triple talaq as 'unconstitutional' by 3:2 majority  
Congress MP Ranjeet Ranjan cries foul, says her convoy didn't crush anyone  
PM Modi assures Centre's support to EPS, OPS-led TN Govt  
OPS sworn in as TN Dy Chief Minister  
Rohingya Muslims begs not to drive them away, say they’ll leave ‘one day’  
AIADMK 'united' again: OPS to be Dy. CM  
Congress MP Ranjeet Ranjan's convoy crushes three to death  
Three Kashmiri youth arrested for disrespecting National Anthem  
Congress demands proof on Jaitley's demonetisation claim  
Chhattisgarh: Woman delivers baby at playground as primary health centre remains shut  
Former DIG submits evidence to ACB showing Sasikala entering jail in civilian attire  
Malegaon blast: SC grants bail to Lt Col Purohit  
Indian economy grew fastest under Modi govt: Amit Shah  
50-yr-old woman stabbed to death by son  
Flood situation worsens in Bihar; death toll rises to 253  
Utkal Express derailment: GM sent on leave, four suspended  
Drone spotted at Delhi airport, flight operations halted  
Congress MP Adhir Chowdhury escapes miraculously unhurt in massive accident  
Vailankanni gears up for annual church festival  
JD(U) warns Sharad Yadav against crossing ‘Lakshman Rekha’  
Utkal Express derailment: Traumatised survivors recount horror  
4.5 magnitude quake jolts Chandoli-Koyana area of Maharashtra  
Muzaffarnagar train derailment: Rescue ops complete, restoration works underway  
Rahul Gandhi meets Gorakhpur tragedy victims' kin, assures help  
Congress hits back at Adityanath's 'picnic spot' remark  
 
Do you think conspiracy is going on to trap Senkumar in cases?
yes
 
no
 
don't know
 
 
 
Home Kerala India World Business Sports Sci&Tech Education Automobile CityNews Movies Environment Letters 
© Copyright keralakaumudi Online 2011  |  Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Head Office Address: Kaumudi Buildings, Pettah P.O, Trivandrum - 695024, India.
Online queries talk to Deepu Sasidharan, + 91 98472 38959 or Email deepu[at]kaumudi.com
Customer Service -Advertisement Disclaimer Statement   |  Copyright Policy