Bookmark Kaumudi Online  Bookmark this site  Editor@Kaumudi  |  Marketing  Print Advt rates  |  Calendar 2012        Go!    
 
 
June 27, Tuesday 2017 9:15 PM       

       HEADLINES: Fighting fever epidemic: Kerala on a cleaning-up drive                                              Bhagyalakshmi criticises Salim Kumar and ‘Women in Cinema Collective’                                              Actress attacked in Kochi: Director Lal rejects Dileep’s statement                                              Investigation in right direction: Suresh Gopi on actress attacked in Kochi case                                              Kochi Metro bogged down by unseemly controversies                                              SC refuses to stay Govt's Aadhaar notification                                              Satisfied with our work: Yogi on completing 100 days in UP                                              Pak targets LoC posts with mortar bombs on Eid: Army                                              JIT to interrogate Sharif's daughter Maryam Nawaz in Panama case                                              China claims Indian troops crossed border, blocks pilgrims                                              Modi, Trump vow to fight terrorism                                              Abducted priest seen alive as Islamists hold out in Philippines                                              Macron says France will not recognise Crimea 'annexation'                                              Bumrah rises to second spot in T20 rankings                                              Aditi Ashok records career-best finish on LPGA tour                                              Jeevan's life: lucky, unlucky and lucky again                                              Kaumudi Facebook
       INDIA Next Article: Rajiv case: HC adjourns plea of life convict Murugan  
       Triple talaq not integral to Islam, is intra-community tussle, Centre tells SC
 
         Posted on :08:02:24 May 18, 2017
   
A A
       Last edited on:15:28:21 May 18, 2017
         Tags: Triple talaq not integral to Islam, is intra-
 
NEW DELHI: Triple talaq is neither integral to Islam nor a "majority versus minority" issue but rather an "intra-community tussle" between Muslim men and deprived women, the Centre on Wednesday told the Supreme Court.
 
Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, in his rebuttal to the arguments favouring the 1,400 year-old practice of triple talaq, made a strong pitch for judicial scrutiny on grounds including violation of fundamental rights like right to equality and gender justice and said that the apex court cannot shy away.
 
A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar, asked the Centre as to why it did not legislate to regulate marriages and divorce among Muslims.
 
"You (Centre) said if court quashes triple talaq then you will make a law but why the government did not make a law for last 60 years?" the bench, also comprising justices Kurian Joseph, R F Nariman, U U Lalit and Abdul Nazeer, asked.
 
Rohatgi replied that the hallmark of a secular court was to reform without waiting for a legislation, when such matters come to it.
 
"I will do what I have to do but the question is what will you (court) do? I have given statement on instruction. I speak for the government and can't speak for parliament," he said reiterating that the top court was guardian of fundamental rights and has to see whether there was any violation of such rights.
 
Earlier during the day, the bench asked the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) whether a woman can be given an option of saying 'no' to triple talaq at the time of execution of 'nikahnama' (marriage contract).
 
"Can it be made possible to give an option to a wife that she can say that she was agreeable to or not agreeable to it (triple talaq)? 
 
"Is it possible to pass a resolution to all 'qazis' to include this condition (giving right to woman to say 'no' to triple talaq) in 'nikahnama'? Give an option to wife to say 'no' to triple talaq," the bench said.
 
Former Union minister and senior lawyer Kapil Sibal, representing the AIMPLB, said that he will respond to after talking to all the board members.
 
Rohatgi, responding to Sibal and a battery of senior lawyers favouring triple talaq, said even the core of religion has to be tested on the touchstone of fundamental rights.
 
Referring to the responses of the AIMPLB, he said that even they say that triple talaq was "undesirable", "sinful" but yet valid and wondered "then how it can be said to be integral to religion".
 
He further said this time, Muslim women have questioned the centuries-old "hegemony suffered by them at the hands of their male counterparts" of the community.
 
"The prism through which you see the case is not like majority versus minority but this is a case where it is an intra-community tussle between Muslim men and women.
 
"This time Muslim women have questioned the centuries-old hegemony suffered by them at the hands of their male counterparts," Rohatgi said, adding that the practice of triple talaq is a tussle between the "haves and have-nots" inside the community.
 
He said this fight is between men of Muslim community, who are more powerful, empowered and educated and women, not so powerful, not empowered and uneducated.
 
The court can fill up the void by judicial pronouncements if there is no law on a particular issue, Rohatgi said, adding the guidelines on sexual harassment at work place were framed by it in the Vishakha case.
 
Rohatgi referred to practises 'sati', infanticide, 'devdasi' and untouchability among Hindus and said that they have been done away with.
 
"Did courts do it? These were abolished by legislations," the bench asked.
 
"Then why do the court goes into issues like Vishaka. The court can't say that it is helpless and it cannot step in. It is the guardian of fundamental right," Rohatgi replied.
 
He said that India is "secular country with a secular constitution" which has kept core of all religions intact but they are subject to fundamental rights.
 
"We had several religions after Partition. There were people from over 600 princely states and tribes practising different faiths and religions. The core of every religion was kept but they were made subject to fundamental rights," he said.
 
He said under Article 25 (right to practice religion) of Constitution, even the core component of a religion can be tested on the grounds of fundamental rights.
 
"Rights given under Article 25 of Constitution cannot be considered as absolute", he said, adding the court has to look into these aspects as a community cannot decide what is their fundamental rights.
 
Comparing practices in Islamic countries, Rohatgi said that in 25 nations, religion continued to strive even after abolishing triple talaq and hence, this cannot be termed as "integral part of Islam".
 
"What is optional cannot be under Article 25 and it cannot be considered as an essential part of religion. If it had been integral part of religion then the religion will not remain religion in its original form but if it is optional then even if it is taken out, the religion will remain the same," he said.
 
He said that if the right to religion went against the fundamental rights, then it is the Constitution which will prevail over practices like triple talaq.
 
Sibal, who started arguments today, referred to a Delhi High Court judgement and said that it was wrong in holding that all schools of thought termed 'triple talaq' as "sinful".
 
The Supreme Court cannot be called upon to decide as to what was wrong or right with the practice and belief, he said.
 
Referring to a judgement, he went to the extent of saying that the personal law is a legitimate basis of discrimination.
 
AIMPLB also said that the court should not venture into the issue on its own as no one has approached it.
 
"Some persons have come to this court," the bench said.
 
Sibal said challenging the constitutional validity of triple talaq, being practised by a small portion of community, may revive the practice which is dying.
 
He said if a secular court like the Supreme Court decides to undertake suo motu (on its own) scrutiny of the issue with the Centre seeking a ban then, the community may take a tough stand.
 
The Muslim community is like small birds on which golden eagle preys, he said, adding "the community's nests must have the Supreme Court protection." 
 
Sibal said it is that faith with which the community is before the court today seeking protection of its personal law customs and practices.
 
"Our faith in this court for last 67 years is fundamental and with that faith we have come here," he said.
 
Today was the fifth day of the hearing on a clutch of petitions challenging triple talaq, polygamy and 'nikah halala' which is going on before a bench comprising members of different religious communities including Sikh, Christian, Parsi, Hindu and Muslim. .
A A
       INDIA
Next Article: Rajiv case: HC adjourns plea of life convict Murugan
 
 
INDIA HEADLINES
Man runs car over friends; kills one, injures another  
UP: Mother-daughter abducted, gang raped  
Prison riot: Indrani Mukerjea moves special CBI court claiming assault  
Gulberg massacre: Gujarat HC grants bail to VHP leader Atul Vaidya  
Fast track interlinking river projects: Stalin writes to PM  
Meira Kumar says casteism bug should be buried, bats for equality  
Girl burnt alive for resisting molestation bid  
Satisfied with our work: Yogi on completing 100 days in UP  
SC refuses to stay Govt's Aadhaar notification  
Pak targets LoC posts with mortar bombs on Eid: Army  
K Kasturirangan heads panel on National Education Policy  
'Act of God' blamed for cable car accident that killed seven in Gulmarg  
CRB visits country's first underwater tunnel project  
In talks with India over Mansarovar pilgrimage issue: China  
CBI arrests a DRT official in alleged bribery case  
Municipal Commissioner arrested for taking bribe in MP  
Miss Haryana Manushi Chhillar crowned Femina Miss India 2017  
Indrani Mukherjea, others booked for rioting in Byculla jail  
Surgical strikes prove India’s strength, no country questioned it: Modi  
Sushma attacks Meira Kumar for interrupting her in 2013 LS speech  
Pilgrim dies after falling from train  
Modi greets nation on Eid, says diversity is India's strength  
Five more TN fishermen arrested by Sri Lankan Navy  
Telugu actor Ravi Teja's brother killed in accident  
Two Army personnel injured in encounter  
 
Actress case: Do you think Pulsar Suni's letter is part of a conspiracy?
yes
 
no
 
don't know
 
 
 
Home Kerala India World Business Sports Sci&Tech Education Automobile CityNews Movies Environment Letters 
© Copyright keralakaumudi Online 2011  |  Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Head Office Address: Kaumudi Buildings, Pettah P.O, Trivandrum - 695024, India.
Online queries talk to Deepu Sasidharan, + 91 98472 38959 or Email deepu[at]kaumudi.com
Customer Service -Advertisement Disclaimer Statement   |  Copyright Policy